The Power of Restorative Justice in Handling Criminal Act if Forgery if Letter
Case Study : P/267/V/2022/SPKT/Pamekasan Police/East Java Regional Police
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61806/al-tatawur.v3i2.54Keywords:
Document-Forgery, Investigation, Police Regulation, Pretrial, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This study investigates the application and implications of Restorative Justice in resolving a criminal case involving document forgery, as recorded in Police Report Number LP/B/267/V/2022/SPKT/POLRES PAMEKASAN/POLDA EAST JAVA. The case was initially handled by the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Pamekasan Police and resolved through a restorative justice process in accordance with Police Regulation No. 6 of 2019 concerning criminal investigations and Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021 concerning restorative justice mechanisms. However, the resolution later encountered legal obstacles, culminating in a Pretrial Motion filed under Case Number 1/Pid.Pra/2024/PN.Pmk at the Pamekasan District Court. The research findings indicate that the investigative process did not fully comply with the procedural standards set forth in the governing regulations. Notably, the victim (reporter) did not consent to the use of restorative justice, a fundamental requirement in such processes. Additionally, the reported party (suspect) failed to meet the agreed-upon obligations as part of the resolution. Compounding these issues, investigators prematurely issued a warrant and decision to terminate the investigation without ensuring all legal conditions were satisfied. As a result, the court accepted the pretrial motion and declared the termination unlawful, thereby ordering the resumption of the investigation. This case study underscores the critical importance of adhering to procedural safeguards and obtaining mutual consent from all parties involved in restorative justice processes. It also highlights the potential legal consequences of procedural missteps by law enforcement authorities and reinforces the need for enhanced training and oversight in the implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia's criminal justice system.
References
Abdullah, F. N., Definisi perlindungan hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Alamsyah, D., Pilar dasar ilmu kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 2013.
Amiruddin and Z. Asikin, Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
Budiyanto, Standar profesi kesehatan. Jakarta: Wordpress, 2010.
Chazawi, A., Pelajaran hukum pidana 2: Penafsiran hukum pidana, dasar pemidanaan & peringanan pidana, kejahatan aduan, perbarengan & ajaran kausalitas. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Farid, A. Z. A., Hukum pidana 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007.
Firliana, R. and Y. Widaningsih, Hukum korporasi rumah sakit. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2010.
Hadjon, P. M., Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu, 1987.
Hasan, I., Analisis data penelitian dengan statistik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2010.
Hasbullah, H. T., "Pengendalian infeksi di rumah sakit," Cermin Kedokteran Indonesia, no. 82, 1993.
Hukumonline, "Perlindungan hukum: Pengertian, teori, contoh, dan cara memperolehnya," Hukumonline, Jul. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perlindungan-hukum-contoh--dan-cara-memperolehnya-lt61a8a59ce8062
Husain, U., Problematika & pengendalian infeksi nosokomial. Jakarta: Salemba Medika, 2008.
Ilyas, A. and Y. Widaningsih, Hukum korporasi rumah sakit. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2010.
Irianto, K., Memahami berbagai macam penyakit. Bandung: Erlangga, 2015.
Isfandyarie, A., Tanggung jawab hukum dan sanksi bagi dokter. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2011.
Komariah, A. and D. Satori, Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.
Marwan, M. and J. P. Marpaung, Kamus hukum. Surabaya: Reality Publisher, 2009.
Menteri Kesehatan RI, Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 1204/MENKES/SK/X/2004 tentang Persyaratan Kesehatan Lingkungan Rumah Sakit, 2004.
Menteri Kesehatan RI, Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 270/MENKES/SK/III/2007 tentang Pedoman Manajerial PPI di RS & Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Lainnya, 2007.
Menteri Kesehatan RI, Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 382/MENKES/SK/III/2007 tentang Pedoman PPI di RS & Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Lainnya, 2007.
Menteri Kesehatan RI, Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 tentang Program Pengendalian Resistensi Antimikroba di Rumah Sakit, 2015.
Prasetyo, A., "Dampak psikologis pandemi COVID-19 terhadap tenaga kesehatan," Jurnal Psikologi Kesehatan, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 200–215, 2021.
Prasko, Pendidikan & hukum & kesehatan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.
Rahardjo, S., Ilmu hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Rahmawati, S., "Peran organisasi profesi dalam perlindungan hukum tenaga kesehatan," Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–134, 2019.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, 2009.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit, 2009.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 tentang Tenaga Kesehatan, 2014.
Rumah Sakit Dokter Kariadi, Pedoman pengendalian infeksi nosokomial. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2007.
Saefullah, Konsep dasar hukum pidana. Malang: Penerbit Fakultas Syariah UIN Malang, 2004.
Sari, R. and D. Suryani, "Perlindungan hukum tenaga kesehatan di rumah sakit," Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2020.
Septiaru, B. B., Infeksi nosokomial. Jakarta: Nuha Medika, 2012.
Sumitro, R. H., Metodologi penelitian hukum dan jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1988.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Al-Tatawur: International journal of Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
