Educational Research Methods: Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Paradigms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61806/al-tatawur.v3i3.68Keywords:
Educational, Paradigm, Qualitative, Quantitative, ResearchAbstract
This paper analyzes the differences between the quantitative and qualitative research paradigms. The method used is a literature review, involving exploring various sources, including books and articles, related to the topic. After gathering the data, the author analyzes it based on its content and concludes the findings. The results show that in research, the positivist paradigm, or scientific research, and the post-positivist paradigm, or naturalistic research, tend to be more dominant. These two paradigms can be selected or combined depending on the data or problem being studied by each researcher. The positivist paradigm is commonly used in quantitative research, while in qualitative research, the post-positivist paradigm is more frequently applied. In practice, the selection of a paradigm is adjusted according to the research problem to produce comprehensive and in-depth studies. Additionally, the appropriate choice of paradigm clarifies the research direction and provides each researcher with ease in developing knowledge theories based on the data collected in the field.
References
Afif, Z., et al. (2023). Penelitian ilmiah (kuantitatif) beserta paradigma, pendekatan, asumsi dasar, karakteristik. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(3), 682–693.
Andini, W., et al. (2022). Paradigma penelitian kuantitatif dalam jurnal ilmiah metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 1(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57
Andini, W., Fitriani, D., & Purba, L. K. N. (2022). Paradigma penelitian kuantitatif dalam jurnal ilmiah metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 1(1), 6–12. https://jurnal.diklinko.id/index.php/tarbiyah/
Bariah, S., et al. (2024). Buku ajar konsep dasar penelitian. Jambi: Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Batubara, J. (2017). Paradigma penelitian kualitatif dan filsafat ilmu pengetahuan dalam konseling. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 3(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.26638/jfk.387.2099
Bofe, G. C. J., & Adam, A. (2024). Penerapan pelayanan kesehatan berbasis aplikasi oleh dinas kesehatan melalui telaah paradigma konstruktivisme. Jurnal Kesehatan dan Kedokteran, 3(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukeke.v3i2.1274
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Elfrianto, & Lesmana, G. (2022). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Umsu Press.
Haryono, E. (n.d.). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif di perguruan tinggi keagamaan Islam. An-Nuur: The Journal of Islamic Studies.
Madyaningrum, M. E. (2023). Paradigma transformatif dan relevansinya bagi riset-riset psikologi tentang disabilitas. Buletin Psikologi, 31(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.83814
Millah, A. S., et al. (2023). Analisis data dalam penelitian tindakan kelas. Jurnal Kreativitas Mahasiswa, 1(2), 140–153.
Nababan, K., et al. (2024). Metode penelitian kualitatif bidang pendidikan: Konsep dan aplikasi. Tomohon: Tahta Media Group.
Noor, Z. Z. (2015). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif (Petunjuk praktis untuk penyusunan skripsi, tesis, dan disertasi). Deepublish.
Pratama, F. F., & Dhian, M. (2020). Paradigma kualitatif sebagai landasan berpikir pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 17(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v17i1.18701
Prayogi, A., et al. (2024). Pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif: Suatu telaah. Al Irsyad: Jurnal Studi Islam, 1(2), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.54150/alirsyad.v2i1.99
Rosyidin, M. (n.d.). Teori hubungan internasional: Dari perspektif klasik sampai non-Barat. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Rukminingsih, D. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Penelitian kuantitatif, penelitian kualitatif, penelitian tindakan kelas. Yogyakarta: Erhaka Utama.
Rustamana, A., et al. (2024). Cendikia pendidikan penelitian metode kuantitatif. Sindoro Cendekia Pendidikan.
Situmorang, D. M., & Cahyani, A. (2023). Analisis laporan realisasi anggaran pendapatan dan belanja pada PT Pelindo Regional 3 (PERSERO). Surplus: Jurnal Riset Mahasiswa Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.35449/surplus.v3i2.751
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanti, N. (2014). Paradigma penelitian kualitatif dalam bisnis. DIE: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 10(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.30996/die.v10i1.236
Susanto, P. C., et al. (2024). Konsep penelitian kuantitatif: Populasi, sampel, dan analisis data (sebuah tinjauan pustaka). JIM: Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v3i1.504
Uno, H. B. (2020). Paradigma penelitian. Prosiding Webinar Magister Pendidikan Dasar Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, 1–11.
Uno, H. B., & Lamatenggo, N. (2016). Tugas guru dalam pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Yasin, M., et al. (2024). Metode dan instrumen pengumpulan data (kualitatif dan kuantitatif). [Nama Jurnal], 2(3), 161–173.
Yulianty, P. D., & Jufri, A. (2020). Perdebatan empiris: Prinsip metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif untuk penelitian sosial ekonomi. Value: Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 15(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.32534/jv.v15i2.1291
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Al-Tatawur: International journal of Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
